Comparative Issues in the Archaeology of Roman Rural Landscape. Site Classification between Survey, Excavation and Historical Categories, (suppl. Journal of Roman Archaeology 88), 2012, 135 p., 34 fig. -

R. E. Witcher, "That from a long way off look like farms": the classification of Roman rural sites ; G. Schörner, Comparing surface, topsoil and subsurface ceramic assemblages: the case of Il Monte, San Gimignano ; F. Vermeulen, The integration of survey, excavation, and historical data in northern Picenum ; T. de Haas, Beyond dots on the map: intensive survey data and the interpretation of small sites and off-site distributions ; R. E. Roth, From tombs to settlements: funerary assemblages and the classification of sites in Republican Etruria ; J. E. Francis, What's so rural about the landscape of Roman Crete? ; P. A.J. Atteman G.-J. Burgers, A comparative view of the Hellenistic and Roman landscape in three Italian regions ; A. Launaro, Why, what and how to compare: site trends and population dynamics in Roman Italy (200 B.C.–A.D. 100).